I know what you mean, I just wanted to be 100% sure it was the cause, but having re-read the ingredients I think its the algae as I have a lot of skin problems when I eat any sushi that has algae/seaweed with it, so I won't be re-trying this foundation now. probably best to wait for more reviews before putting the money down, thats probably what I should have done ) I have a feeling it might be the algae in this that caused me the problem as I don't get on with products containing that, I should have looked at the box better! :) Yes, I was surprised it was light enough. LOL, I hope lots of people buy this shade so they expand their normal range, I could really do with a lighter shade of the pro long wear as that seems to be my go to foundation x I bought this from a MAC free-standing store. In terms of what skin type would benefit best from this, from my experience I would say dryer skin, maybe more mature and not an acne sufferer. It does has a chemical smell to it, I don't notice it once on as such but do when I apply it, ingredients below: I think I'll give my skin a month to heal and then re-try just to be sure, but at this point I am pretty confident this was the cause of the new spots. I don't find this long lasting, I'd say the coverage faded after about 5 hours (with no powdering on top).Īlthough there are flaws with the wear and feel of this, I was very happy with the colour and liked the overall finish, however I had to stop using this.Īs mentioned my skin was recovering from a break out when I started using this, I had been wearing this everyday and kept getting more and more spots, since I stopped wearing it I've had no new spots. It also feels heavy during the day and I had more shine breakthrough than normal so I'm not sure how well it would fare with oily skin. On application this felt moisturising, yet I noticed it looked a bit cakey on parts of my skin where I was recovering from a break out. Shade 1.0 is slightly yellow toned, yet still looks natural, here is it on the left compared to the pro long wear NC15 on the right. The coverage is medium, the finish is semi matte, it does give the skin a more healthy look and I did notice some of my lines looked diffused with this. I've just dispensed a bit of Matchmaster on the Left and Pro long wear on the right to show the more runny texture of long wear. The texture is slightly thicker, more creamy compared to the liquid feel of pro long wear. The foundation comes in the same pump style packaging as the pro long wear, albeit a slighter larger size, 35ML, as opposed to 30 ML. The first thing that struck me about the Matchmaster foundation (£24.50) was the shade range, the lightest shade 1.0 is lighter than a NW/NC 15, great news if like me you have found MAC foundations too dark. We would honestly love to hear your feedback, if you have an idea for a new rating criteria, let us know! post in the feedback forum, or send us an email to. compare and evaluate similar products based on the exact same criteria. you can identify that a product is rated highly for formula thickness without reading walls of text. there isn’t a right answer, only your opinion.Īn added benefit to the scales is quickly seeing how a product might perform. Thin might be a desired quality for you, while thick might be desired for someone else. formula thickness ranges from thin to thick. the scale allows reviewers to provide an in-depth review of specific aspects of a product, making writing reviews easy, fast, detailed, and fun!Īs an example, one rating criteria for foundation is formula thickness. blushgarden provides a ratings scale for distinct criteria (based on the product’s category) along with traditional comments. A different way to read and write beauty product reviews about Matchmaster Spf 15 Foundation by MAC.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |